Why We’re Launching Weekly Gatherings

I’ve been encouraged by several readers to keep posting some of the things we’re learning from this experience of launching The Fulcrum Community. By nature I love to share what I’m learning, so I’m happy to do so.

As I’ve written elsewhere, we’ve been hesitant to move too quickly into launching a weekly large group gathering.

One reason is that we wanted our core group to develop a sense of community and prove that we could be “church” to each other without relying on such a gathering. We also wanted to experiment and see how meeting together only a couple of times a month would shape us. Would it encourage or discourage connections with new people? Could we grow numerically without a regular gathering?

After six months of experimentation we’ve decided to launch weekly large group gatherings on September 12th.

In no particular order, here’s a list of why we decided a weekly large group gathering is a good idea:

1. In this neck of the woods, it gives cultural legitimacy to a community of faith. Even those who have no interest in attending the gathering expect it to be a weekly affair. Stray too far away from the cultural norm and you come across as weird and not in a way that the people of Austin want to keep.

2. It’s harder to keep a group of people focused on a unified vision when they’re only getting together a couple of times a month. Vision leaks and it leaks fast when we’re not being reminded of it regularly.

3. If someone misses a twice-a-month gathering, it means a month will pass before they’re with everyone again. If they miss two in a row, it’s six weeks. Not as big a deal if they’re in a small group that meets weekly, but if they’re not (and not everyone will be), then it is easy for them to lose touch with the community.

4. When the purpose of the home group is not geared toward deep Bible study (and ours are not), then the larger community doesn’t get much exposure to Scripture. Call me old fashioned, but I think most people need to hear the gospel more than twice a month.

5. If you have a gifted teacher or worship leader in the community, it puts his or her gifts in the dock half the time. Since one of my primary gifts is teaching and Patrick is a gifted worship leader, this made less and less sense as we went along. I’m not sure if I should have said this one out loud, but it’s the truth.

6. Most people we’ve encountered aren’t going to come to a home group first. It’s asking a lot of someone to show up at a strange house and hang out with ten people they don’t know for 90 minutes. Extroverts may not mind it so much, but half the population are introverts. A larger group gathering feels safer than a home group setting.

7. Our kids like seeing all their friends at the large group gathering each week. They were always disappointed on our off weeks.

8. It made it a bit harder to invite our friends to come to one of our gatherings. We’d have people ask us, “Are you meeting this week?” It never felt right saying “No, but we’ll meet the next Sunday.” Sometimes it takes multiple invitations before someone shows interest. If they showed interest on a week we weren’t meeting, if felt like a lost opportunity.

9. Most of us weren’t using our off Sundays productively. Instead of using that time for service projects or cultural engagement, some of us were sleeping in and/or staying at home and doing nothing. A few among us, who admit to being addicted to attending church services, would attend gatherings at other churches out of habit or a sense of guilt.

10. I don’t have a tenth reason. I’ve been trying to think of one for two weeks, but I’m done. You’ll have to live with only nine.

The Funnel of Love

Here’s something that some of us at Fulcrum have been kicking around. I’d love your feedback.

******

As we’ve thought about our ministry strategy for Fulcrum, we’ve developed three environments and one exercise that are central to our pursuit of Christlikeness.

1. Large Group Worship Gathering: Primary purpose is worship and teaching. This is the front door through which most newcomers enter to check out our community.
2. Home Groups: Primary purpose is missional community. Community that is the bi-product of a group of people being on mission together.
3. Microgroups: 3-4 people. Primary purpose is deeper bible study and mutual encouragement to grow in Christlikeness.
4. Personal Growth plan: After taking a brief survey that assesses personality type, learning style, and spiritual trajectory each person develops a personalized plan for Spiritual formation.

One way to implement this is as a funnel through which each person who becomes a part of our community will be moved. The shape of the funnel sets the expectations for involvement in each environment. The further we travel down the funnel, the less people will be involved in each activity. There will always be more people in the large group gathering than in the home groups just as there will always be more people in home groups than in microgroups. The number of people who will actually complete and implement a personal growth plan will be but a small fraction of the number who attend the large group gathering.

To increase participation in each level moving down the funnel, we’ll start using rhetoric that communicates that the further down the funnel you travel the more important the activity is.

“We believe life change happens in a small group setting,” we could say in the large group gathering when trying to get people to sign up for a home group.

“Microgroups are the basic building block of our church,” we could say to those who are in a home group, but not yet meeting in a microgroup.

“Developing a personal growth plan is the missing element in most people’s quest for Christlikeness,” we could say when trying get people to take the survey and develop their plan.

As we ramp up the rhetoric, an unsettling irony will emerge: the activities that we say are the most important will end up being the things in which most of our community is the least involved.

Does it have to be this way?

What would happen if we refused to give any one environment a privileged place in our programming or our promotional rhetoric and instead held all of them up as equally important and valid options for those who are a part of our community? What if we encouraged each person to invest their time and energy into whichever environment is best suited for their particular season of life and stage of spiritual development?

Let’s say a single, introverted, skeptical young man shows up on a Sunday morning in response to an invitation from a friend. He’s intrigued enough by what he sees and hears to keep coming back. What do we do with him? Do we start trying to funnel him into a home group? Do we make sure he understands that he’s not really a part of our community until he joins one? What if he never joins a home group, but after several months of showing up and listening and pondering, he’s finally willing to join a microgroup with his friend who originally invited him? The combination of the large group gathering and the microgroup where he can ask questions and discuss possibilities is exactly what he needs. The thought of attending a home group has no appeal to him whatsoever, because as an introvert he always feels awkward in groups of 10 to 15 people.

Is this okay or does this young man need to submit to my plan for his life and work his way down the funnel?

Instead of arranging these activities in the shape of a funnel, what if we laid them out like a configurable computer dashboard? We could present each environment with a clear explanation of its purpose and the anticipated outcomes for those who participate in it. Without prioritizing any one environment above the other, we would encourage each person or family to invest themselves in whichever environments make the most sense for them.

The large group gathering is a great way to be introduced to our community and meet a few people and get a sense of what we’re about. Home groups are a great way to develop a sense of community with a handful of others. Microgroups are a great way to go deeper into Scripture and to explore the spiritual disciplines within a more intimate environment. Developing a personal growth plan is a great exercise for those who are hungry to grow and looking for “next steps.”

If we regularly communicate the availability and purpose of these options without prioritizing any one above the other, could we trust that through adequate pastoral coaching and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, each person in our community would discern which environments, activities, and exercises are best suited for them at any given moment?

Could we live with the outcome of this kind of approach?
Not everyone will be in a home group. Not everyone will be interested in a microgroup. Not everyone will be working on a personal growth plan. Not everyone will regularly attend the large group worship gathering (Although most will or it would cease to be the large group gathering!). But they’ll all still be a part of our community, and to the degree they invest themselves in at least one of these environments, they’ll be connected and hopefully growing.

Of course, after some time in a given environment, their growth may stall. When that happens, they can opt into a new environment and be stimulated to grow in new areas and ways. Take the skeptical young man mentioned above. After a year of attending the gathering and being a part of a microgroup, he gives his life to Christ. Not long after that, he meets an attractive young woman at the large group gathering who invites him to her home group. He decides to give it a try. He still feels awkward in small groups, but he decides having his comfort zone stretched in this area is a good thing. That, and the young woman who invited him is really attractive. In order to conserve his social bandwidth for the group, he decides to take a break from his microgroup. No problem. He’s still growing!

What do you think? Is this idealistic crazy talk or could it work?

The Main Event

Back in March I asked the question: How Necessary is the Weekly Worship Gathering? We had a good discussion in the comments. Several months later, I find myself making plans for September 12th when The Fulcrum Community will launch weekly large group gatherings. In a future post, I’ll give my reasons for why a weekly large group gathering is still a good idea in this neck of the woods, but first I want to invite you into a discussion the Fulcrum team has been having over the past few weeks.

One of our biggest concerns about a weekly gathering is that it can quickly become “The Main Event” of The Fulcrum Community. If we are not careful, it will become the primary way we evaluate our success (How many showed up and how much money did they give?), it will dominate our budget (How much did you say that zip line and fog machine cost?), it will absorb energy that could otherwise be spent building relationships (We can’t have dinner with the neighbors tomorrow night, we’ve got a worship planning meeting!).

My question today is: How can a church have a weekly worship gathering without turning it into The Main Event? How do we communicate that all the other activities and environments associated with our community are just as important as what we do on Sunday morning?