I’m in Malibu, California at the Pepperdine University lectures. This week we’re hearing messages based on the stories of Genesis. Not that I really care what the lectures are based on. I’d come to listen to lectures about the intricacies of Obadiah if they were in Malibu.

Last night Rick Marrs talked about the call of Abraham in Gen. 12. He made a great point about how we tend to be fascinated with why God chose Abe. What qualities did God see in him? Why Abe and not somebody else? Marrs said the answer to such questions don’t matter. The story is not about Abraham, it’s about God.

We are too quick to approach every text in the Bible from a human/moralistic point of view. Rather than celebrating and simply embracing the call and promise of God, we want to figure out how we can be worthy of the promises of God like Abraham or whoever. Even a not so careful reading of Genesis should make clear, however, that God didn’t call the worthy. He called people like Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. They were weak-kneed, character flawed, and just like us.

That’s good news.

I’ve added some notes from Healthy Congregations to the Book Notes section of the site.

Interview with N.T. Wright about the resurrection


You say that the Hebrew bible is not largely concerned with what happens to people when they die. That might surprise many Christians.

Yes, but it is not actually controversial. You can search the Old Testament from end to end, and even if you take a maximal view of passages like the “I know that my redeemer liveth” bit in Job, you’re still left with a very small selection over against the vast mass of the Old Testament in which the question is not even raised.

What is the point then?

I grew up with the view that in the early Old Testament period, there was no interest in life after death. In a middle period, represented by some of the Psalms, there were the beginnings of an interest in life after death. And then finally, with Daniel, you get resurrection, as though that’s a progression away from the early period.

The view that I came to is that the main thing the whole Old Testament is concerned with is the God of Israel, as the Creator God who has made a good creation, and that what matters about human life really is that it’s meant to be lived within God’s good, lovely, created world. That is equally emphatic in the early period, where you get agricultural festivals that celebrate Yahweh as king over the crops and the land. It’s equally emphatic there and in the doctrine of resurrection. From that point of view, the idea of a disembodied, nonspacio-temporal life after death appears as a rather odd blip in between these two strong affirmations of the goodness of the created order and the wonderful God-givenness of human bodily life within that created order.

So, instead of resurrection being a step away from the early period, it is a way of reaffirming what the early period was trying to get at: the goodness of creation.


On Friday I was taken to lunch by a great guy from my church. We ate at Nelsons Buffeteria, an eatery in downtown Tulsa dating back to 1929. They have maintained the old town diner atmosphere. I had an incredible chicken fried steak, mashed potatoes, green beans, and a buttery dinner roll. I chased all that down with a piece of coconut pie. The food was great, but what made the experience was the music. While we were eating a local band was playing Bob Wills style Texas Swing. I felt like I had stepped back in time.

Eating at Nelsons on a regular basis will kill me. If I dont eat there every now and then, Ill die.

Tonight our leadership team will continue our study of the gospel and the kingdom of God. Here is the handout I’ll use to start the discussion. It’s extremely oversimplified, but gives us something to work with.

Gospel–an announcement of good news concerning a victory that has been won by God on behalf of his people.

Highlights of Old Testament “Gospel”
Gen. 1-2–Creation is “good.” Humanity lives in harmony with God, each other, and nature.
Gen. 3–the Fall
Sin is a desire to live independently of God’s will, resulting in the curse.
The curse is seen as a destruction of the harmony in creation. The implications of the curse are enormous.
Humanity’s relationship with God is severed.
Our relationship with each other is altered.
Our relationship with nature/creation is distorted.
Creation itself is cursed.
Gen. 4-11–The implications of the curse expand.
Gen. 12 through Malachi–God promises to bless the world through Abraham and his family(Israel)–the curse will be reversed.
Israel fails to live up to her calling, and is cursed rather than blessed.
In exile she awaits a move of God, promised through the prophets, to forgiver her sins and make good on his promise to Abraham.
Israel’s enemies will be defeated–(A victory will be won!)
God will return to the temple in Jerusalem.
The Davidic Messiah will reign.
Israel will be restored.
In Jesus’ time, this expectation is known as the “Kingdom/Reign of God.”
This is the gospel he came announcing.

From his ministry and teachings, what can we say about the gospel of the “kingdom of God” Jesus came announcing?

What was the nature of his Kingdom/Reign?
In what ways was it a surprise to those who were waiting for it?