How Necessary is the Weekly Worship Gathering?

There is a difference between launching a church comprised of Christ-followers and launching a church service. It’s far easier to do the latter.

The Fulcrum Community launch team has been having some discussions about when would be the right time to launch Cafe Fulcrum as a weekly worship gathering.

Here is how Fulcrum currently convenes. We meet weekly in home groups where we eat, pray, share communion, and have a Bible discussion. We meet twice a month at the Star Co. Coffee house for Cafe Fulcrum. I’ve described what happens at a typical Cafe Fulcrum in a previous post. We also throw periodic parties whenever we can find an excuse to do so (Super Bowl, Oscars, etc).

From the start, our approach has been to begin gathering and forming followers of Jesus without putting so much emphasis on the “main event” of a worship service. That’s why we started out with home groups and why we have put our foot in the pool slowly with monthly and then bimonthly cafes. One of the big issues existing churches are facing is the question of “How do we engage the people we have showing up for our services in a process that will help them become more like Jesus?” The reality is that simply attending a weekly worship service doesn’t necessarily lead to spiritual formation. It plays a role in the process, but its importance is not equal to the emphasis placed on it by most Christians in America.

Because of the way we have started, we have a golden opportunity to experiment and explore other structures and methods that might help us grow to become more like Christ without having to expend most of our energy putting on a weekly gathering. It seems to me that a lot of new churches launch their weekly gatherings before they have their structures and strategies for spiritual formation in place. Too often, the weekly gathering ends up consuming so much energy that they never get around to developing effective discipleship structures and practices. It’s even more dangerous if the weekly gathering picks up some momentum and starts growing. How many church planters find themselves having done quite well at drawing a crowd, but struggling to actually make disciples?

With the bimonthly Cafe, we’ve stumbled on a frequency that allows us to develop our public presence without making it the “main event” of the Fulcrum Community. Right now, I can say to anyone who asks about weekly gatherings that our weekly gatherings happen in homes. I love being able to do this. I hope it is helping us to establish in our DNA that Fulcrum is not just about a Sunday morning worship gathering.

Personally, I miss teaching/preaching every week. There are few things in life that give me more joy. However, I also know what it’s like to teach a crowd of people where many aren’t engaged in an intentional spiritual formation process outside of the gathering. I find few things more depressing.

My guess is that we’ll eventually launch a weekly gathering. But what if we don’t? Is a weekly worship gathering necessary to making disciples of Jesus?

I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Wade’s Crossfit Adventures

In order to revitalize and focus the content of this blog I’ve started a separate blog in which I’ll talk all things crossfit. If you want to check it out, you can find it here.

I’ll use this blog to continue to talk about what I’m learning from launching a new community of faith, post random book reviews, and reflections on storytelling. I may also share a few of my favorite stories that I love to tell.

Thanks for reading!

Why Do Storytellers Embellish?

If you’ve ever tried to tell someone a story about a memorable personal experience, you know how difficult it can be to communicate the event in such a way that the listener experiences a similar impact. Thus the phrase, “I guess you had to be there.” In order to overcome this obstacle, a good storyteller will embellish a few details to heighten the listeners second-hand experience of the event. Whatever was funny, scary, or embarrassing to you when it happened has to be made a bit funnier, scarier, or more embarrassing when you’re telling someone else about it.  That’s just the way storytelling works. I’m betting that just about every true story worth worth listening to is actually “based on a true story.” It happened, but details have been embellished for effect.

Of course, it’s possible to embellish enough details that the story being told has almost no connection to what actually happened. There is an ongoing debate in Hollywood about how many details can be changed in a movie that is “based on a true story” before a line is crossed and fact becomes fiction. How do you know when the line has been crossed? Most of the time, the audience will have a sense that somewhere in the telling the story was no longer grounded in reality. Even if the audience doesn’t know when the line has been crossed, the teller will know. At least for awhile. If he tells the story enough times, he’ll eventually forget which parts were true and which ones he made up.

Nevertheless, storytelling without some embellishment isn’t much fun, for either the teller or the listener. So the next time someone tells you a story worth listening to, rather than wondering whether the details were embellished, just assume that they were. Instead of holding that against the storyteller, be glad that he did it.

Otherwise, you probably wouldn’t have paid attention long enough to care.

By the way, I had a hard time deciding whether to use the word “embellish” or “exaggerate” for this post. Did I choose the right one? Is there a difference between the two words?