Catching Up With Garnett

It’s been about six months since the Leadership Journal article that Greg and I wrote was published. If you haven’t read it yet, you might want to read it and then check out these follow-up posts to it.

Anti-Megachurch?
New Sign Coming

One of the things the article did was let a bunch of people in on what’s going on at Garnett. I’ve had a number of people ask how things are going.  Up until the article was published, I was hesitant to talk about Garnett stuff on this blog because it was so painful. Now that the conversation has gone public I’m going to try to keep you updated on our progress.

One of the things I want to do is try to keep telling the story in as honest a way as possible.  Too often, the only transition stories that get told are the ones that are told in hindsight after the corner has been turned. Stories told in hindsight tend to be more tidy than those told in real time. There is a risk in doing this I suppose, and I may not be able to pull it off without causing unnecessary anxiety for my Garnett readers.  If that’s the case,then I may not be able to follow through with my intentions. There may be a reason why transition stories are usually told after the fact and I’m about to find out why.

The Event Center has been up and running in a formal kind of way since the first of the year. A number of new events have been scheduled and a number community groups are using the facility on a regular basis. It’s been cool to see partnerships form with schools and service organizations. The synergy generated by these partnerships is beginning to build and I predict that major surprises (the good kind) are in store for us. I expect us to have opportunities to participate in a some big events or initiatives that are going to make a huge impact in our neighborhood. What kind of opportunities?  I have no idea and I could be wrong.  I guess it’s just a hunch.

From the church side, we’re still getting used to the idea that we no longer meet in a church building, but that instead we meet in an Event Center.  The transition has gone much better than I had anticipated and the church seems to be supportive of the move we’ve made.  I’m not sure other people from other churches understand why we’re doing what we’re doing, but I’ll save some of those stories for later.

Tend Your Garden

A message based on one of the most important lessons my dad taught me while growing up.

Emusic Anyone?

I’ve really been enjoying emusic. For 9.95 a month you get to download 30 non-restricted mp3 tracks that will play on whatever type of player you have.

You can pick up some really good music from artists you’ve heard of and from some you haven’t. This is a great place to discover new music from independent labels. You can also get some good stand up comedy. Their classical music department is outstanding.

If you want to check it out sign up for their free trial or if you want to send me an email (wadehodgesATgmail.com), I’ll send you an invitation to join and I’ll get a few free tracks if you sign up.

If you do sign up, here are a few recommendations.

Explosions in the Sky: I’ve downloaded everything they have.  It’s great writing music.  Puts me in the mood every time. 

The Frames:  I love this band.  They’re big in Ireland but haven’t really caught on here. I’ve downloaded almost all of their stuff too. I can listen to these guys all day long and sometimes I do.

Arcade Fire

Sinead O’Connor latest album is available. I’m listening to it right now.  It’s good.

You can get your fill of Sufjan Stevens here as well.

And don’t forget to get you some Hall and Oates.

For some good Stephen Wrightish comedy, try Demetri Martin.  They’ve also got some Jim Gaffigan and Mitch Hedberg.

If you’re already downloading from emusic, I’d love to hear your recommendations. What hidden treasures have you found?

Technorati Tags:

What You Regret

Back in May I blogged a bit from The Paradox of Choice by Barry Schwartz.

I’ve found it to be a fascinating book that deserves more than one post.

One of the reasons I’ve enjoyed reading it is because Schwartz gives me this kind of stuff to think about.

One study of regret had participants read the following:

Mr. Paul owns shares in Company A. During the past year he considered switching to stock in Company B, but he decided against it. He now finds out that he would have been better off by $1,200 if he had switched to the stock of Company B. Mr. George owned shares in Company B. During the past year he switched to stock in Company A. He now finds that he would have been better off by $1,200 if he had kept his stock in Company B. Who feels greater regret?

Because both Mr. Paul and Mr. George own shares of Company A and because they would have both been $1,200 richer if they had owned shares in Company B, they seem to be in exactly the same boat. But 92 percent of the respondents think Mr. George will feel worse than Mr. Paul. The key difference between them is that Mr. George regrets something he did, while Mr. Paul regrets something he failed to do. Most of us seem to share the intuition that we regret actions that don’t turn out well more than we regret failures to take actions that would have turned out well. This is sometimes referred to as omission bias, a bias to downplay omissions (failures to act) when we evaluate the consequences of our decisions.

However, recent evidence indicates that acts of commission are not always more salient than acts of omission. The omission bias undergoes a reversal with respect to decisions made in the more distant past. When asked about what they regret most in the last six months, people tend to identify actions that didn’t meet expectations. But when asked about what they regret most when they look back on their lives as a whole, people tend to identify failures to act. In the short run, we regret a bad educational choice, whereas in the long run, we regret a missed educational opportunity. In the short run, we regret a broken romance, whereas in the long run, we regret a missed romantic opportunity. So it seems that we don’t close the psychological door on the decisions we’ve made, and as time passes, what we’ve failed to do looms larger and larger.


Perhaps what they say is true. As we look back on the life we’ve lived, we won’t regret what we’ve done nearly as much as what we’ve failed to do.

What do you think?

And yes, this book has footnotes.

Tolerating Pain

There are many keys to being an effective leader.  Just ask John Maxwell.

One that I’ve been thinking a lot about lately is one that I don’t hear talked about much at leadership conferences.

In order to be an effective leader you have to be able to tolerate pain.  Your own pain as well as the pain of others. Sometimes others will inflict pain upon you. You must absorb and carry it forward in order to lead. Sometimes you will be called upon to inflict pain on others for their own good or for the good of the organization you lead. If you don’t think leaders inflict pain, then go make a decision and see if anyone yelps. Sometimes you will inflict pain upon yourself when you inflict pain on others because you care so much about those whom you are leading.

Without a doubt, one of the hardest things to do as a leader is to watch people we love squirm with emotional pain because of a position we’ve taken. Most of us end up caving sooner or later and we sheepishly reverse our position or change our direction in order to dull the pain and keep the peace.

The reason most churches within my sphere of awareness are struggling to move forward in any kind of discernible way is because their leadership is spending all their time and energy trying to avoid pain.  They think the absence of pain is a sign of good leadership.  Making sure no one gets hurt may be a win for a bank robber (Put your hands in the air and do what you’re told and no one gets hurt), but it’s a terrible way of judging how well we’re doing as leaders.

All pain avoidance does is delay the inevitable, which is . . .pain.

Leaders who try to avoid pain will someday will be confronted with the worst pain of all, the awareness that the end result of their perpetual pain avoidance is the collapse of the organization they were supposed to be leading.

Are you called to lead?  If so, and if you’re not ready to experience and tolerate some pain, then please say no to the call.  Whatever organization you’re being called to lead will be better off without you in leadership. If you’re ready to deal with some pain, then step up and buckle in, because it’s gonna hurt.