Let’s take the following statements out for a walk and see if they bark:
Any interpretation of scripture that equips us for Christlikeness is a valid one. I don’t care what your professor told you, there is a difference between a “right” reading of scripture and a “good” reading. Any reading of Scripture that shapes us positively into the image of Christ is a good one. Truth must be defined more by its ability to transform than its theoretical correctness. Biblical truth that doesn’t transform isn’t really true. An interpretation of scripture should be judged as “true” based upon the kind of life it motivates the church to live, not on how many scholars agree with the interpretation. You shall know an interpretation by its fruit.
Agree or disagree? Why?




Connect with Wade