Mental Accounting

In The Paradox of Choice, Barry Schwartz asks an interesting pair of questions:

Imagine that you have decided to see a concert where admission is $20 a ticket. As you enter the concert hall, you discover that you have lost a $20 bill. Would you still pay $20 for a ticket to the concert?

Schwartz says that almost ninety percent of respondents say yes. Now the second question:

Imagine that you have decided to see a concert and already purchased a $20 ticket. As you enter the concert hall, you discover that you have lost the ticket. The seat was not marked and the ticket cannot be recovered. Would you pay $20 for another ticket?

In this situation, less that 50 percent of respondents say yes.

From a “bottom line” perspective, $40 is $40, but that is not how most people think about such a situation. This is because we not only account for where our money goes in Quicken, but also in our minds. We have psychological accounts in which we categorize how much money is appropriate to spend on a concert. We can justify buying a ticket even after we’ve lost a $20 bill because we’re still only spending $20 on a concert.  Once we buy the ticket, we’ve invested $20 in the concert experience and we’re unwilling to invest more.

Schwartz’s point is that we play some funky games in our head that end up having a bigger impact on our day to day choices than we realize.

Can you think of a time when you’ve engaged in similar psychological shenanigans?

Tired of Blogging

I’ve been blogging for over five years now and I’m tired of it.

I’m especially tired of feeling guilty if I don’t have something interesting to post everyday.

So, for the next month, I’m letting myself off the hook. If I have something to post, I’ll post it. If I don’t, then I’m not going to go digging something up just for the sake of keeping a fresh post at the top of my blog.

Thanks for hanging out here. Thanks for reading. Thanks for encouraging me along the way.

Update: just to be clear. I’m not going to stop blogging. I’m just going to stop thinking for a while.

God-Forsaken Places

Challenging words from Alan Roxburgh:

If we want to discern the emergent work of God, we’ve got to ask, Where are the most God-forsaken places today? Let me suggest to you, one of the most God-forsaken place for us, is the local congregation. Why? They don’t get it. They don’t understand any of this stuff. They are so steeped in a commercialized Gospel. They are so busy trying to make life work and trying to keep up and catch up, that they don’t get it. Here’s what I want to say to you. That is exactly the place where God’s future is going to emerge. Many of us who buy the emergence narrative want to give up on these places. That’s why with so many young leaders today, church planting is the thing. You know why church planting is really the thing? Because they don’t want to bother with that stuff. Because you can’t change it.

The Spirit of God is amongst the people of God. Which means God’s future is amongst God’s people. And I mean that literally, because here’s the next thing: The answer to the question: What is the emerging form of the church today in North America in this complex culture that we live in? – I want to say to you the answer is right there in the suburbs, inner cities and in all those dumb, stupid congregations that don’t get it.

That’s where it is. In the most God-forsaken places in our culture today. That’s where God’s future is present.

That is a radically alternative narrative because God’s future is not found in the new and the next. God’s future is not found in the great high priests of the church who say, “This is how you do it.” God’s future is found in the ordinary men and women who don’t know how to do it.

God’s future is not found in leaders who have the plan and the strategy, the top-down, “aren’t you lucky you’ve got me, I’ve got my M.Div., D.Min., I’ve got a wonderful plan for your life, let’s go.” It’s not where God’s future is found. God’s future is found in the very opposite of that.

God’s future is found in the temporality, materiality, locality, specificity, of particular people in particular places. In other words, there is no big answer out there that big people bring, even at these conferences. There is a confused people, and in the midst of those confused people, is God’s Spirit and God’s future, waiting to emerge.

Therefore, being a leader is not having an answer. Being a leader is being one who is shaped and formed in practices of cultivating environments that call forth that people and that future. And the way in which that future gets cultivated and formed, is by re-entering the memory of the story. But, the gift of our moments is that we have a chance of re-entering that story from below, and outside, and no longer from dominion and power and control.

Five People Sitting Around a Table

A story inspired by Frost and Hirsch’s take on Eph. 4:11-13

The Way I See It #225

This is the best “The Way I See It” quote I’ve seen on a Starbucks cup so far:

People don’t read enough. And what reading we do is cursory, without absorbing the subtleties and nuances that lie deep within–Wow, you’ve stopped paying attention, haven’t you? People can’t even read a coffee cup without drifting off.

David Shore–Creator and executive producer of the television drama “House.”